What should be build on ground Zero, Temple or Mosque? Let's find out the answer, what should we build on ground zero in Ayoudhya?on Mar 5, 2003-The Allahabad High Court orders the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) to undertake excavation of the disputed site to ascertain whether a temple existed at the place where the Babri Masjid was constructed.
Aug 22, 2003-ASI submits its final report to the Allahabad high court. The 574-page report says that excavations found distinctive features of a 10th century temple beneath the Babri Masjid site.
This report giving the clear indication that Mughal emperor Babar built a mosque on a temple which is said to be the birthplace of Lord Ram in Ayodhya so Hindu have the right to built a temple on the ground zero which transparent like water but we failed to find the solution as it is about to 500 year of the conflict. The dispute continues through the British Rule & still it's on. British govt not given solution because their policy was "divide and rule" but why Indian govt delaying in decision? Did they following the same rule? God knows better but totally clear that their must be some politics is going behind this issue. Point to to be noted, if govt favors the Muslim community they have to loose the Hindu votes & if Hindu community than Muslim votes, I think this is the main reason behind this delay means no solution to Ram Janama Bhumi Issue.
At last I would like to say that we should build Ram temple their because it's the birth place of Lord Rama & Muslim community should understand the felling of Hindu community & help them to build the Ram temple. Just like Hazrat Mohammad is the prophet of Muslims, Lord Rama is the prophet of Hindus. Ayodhya is a sacred place of Hindus as Mecca is sacred for Muslims so mosque & temple can be made an where but you can change the birth place of Lord Rama. If Muslim community will think it deeply than they will never go against of making a temple in ground zero. So I think, Ram temple should be made their because Ayodhya belongs to Ram. What you think?
Aug 22, 2003-ASI submits its final report to the Allahabad high court. The 574-page report says that excavations found distinctive features of a 10th century temple beneath the Babri Masjid site.
This report giving the clear indication that Mughal emperor Babar built a mosque on a temple which is said to be the birthplace of Lord Ram in Ayodhya so Hindu have the right to built a temple on the ground zero which transparent like water but we failed to find the solution as it is about to 500 year of the conflict. The dispute continues through the British Rule & still it's on. British govt not given solution because their policy was "divide and rule" but why Indian govt delaying in decision? Did they following the same rule? God knows better but totally clear that their must be some politics is going behind this issue. Point to to be noted, if govt favors the Muslim community they have to loose the Hindu votes & if Hindu community than Muslim votes, I think this is the main reason behind this delay means no solution to Ram Janama Bhumi Issue.
At last I would like to say that we should build Ram temple their because it's the birth place of Lord Rama & Muslim community should understand the felling of Hindu community & help them to build the Ram temple. Just like Hazrat Mohammad is the prophet of Muslims, Lord Rama is the prophet of Hindus. Ayodhya is a sacred place of Hindus as Mecca is sacred for Muslims so mosque & temple can be made an where but you can change the birth place of Lord Rama. If Muslim community will think it deeply than they will never go against of making a temple in ground zero. So I think, Ram temple should be made their because Ayodhya belongs to Ram. What you think?
0 comments:
Post a Comment